🔗 Share this article

Following a notable legal reversal, the Australian classification review board has overturned a prior decision that prevented viewers in Australia from accessing video footage of the shooting incident involving conservative commentator Charlie Kirk. This challenge was initiated by Elon Musk's social media platform, arguing against an directive issued at the request of the online safety regulator.

Background on the Case and Ban

After the fatal shooting of Charlie Kirk at Utah Valley University in last year, the regulator applied to the classification board to assess and rate the available footage. The board first determined the content was "unable to be classified", a rating that empowered the regulator to instruct social media companies to restrict access to the videos for users in Australia.

The platform X challenged the decision for a pair of videos depicting the Kirk incident. It also appealed a comparable ban on another piece of footage—depicting the attack on Iryna Zarutska on a North Carolina train—which had likewise been deemed "unacceptable for distribution".

The Platform's Case and Board's Decision

Arguing its case, X contended that the Kirk video contained only brief violence with the weapon not shown. The company noted the recording was low-quality and the focus shifted rapidly from the individual to the bystanders.

The social media giant maintained the footage was not overly graphic, exploitative, or offensive, stating it served as a neutral objective record of "a notorious public event of public importance that generated extensive public discourse". The platform even compared the footage and the well-known recording of President John F. Kennedy's assassination.

Most members of the review board concluded that, "despite the terrible nature of the event," the content did not reach a level that was exploitative, gratuitous, or offensive enough to justify a complete ban. However, they noted that a longer or clearer version with alternative commentary might have resulted in a different ruling. Consequently, the panel changed the rating of the videos to R18+.

The Minority Viewpoint

A minority on the panel held a contrary view, contending the video was "content designed for sharing for the probable aim of amusement and/or benefit (such as engagement metrics)". They also argued the comparison to the JFK assassination tape was invalid, as the Kennedy video was made public long after the event, "after public sentiment around the matter had subsided".

Reactions to the Outcome

Posting on its official policy channel, X expressed approval of the decision.

"We challenged this case to defend free speech and the critical nature of public access about issues of public interest. We remain dedicated to safeguarding these fundamental values."

A spokesperson for the eSafety commissioner also welcomed the board's decision, but pointed out that the new R18+ rating now implies platforms "must take steps to ensure R18+ material being displayed to Australians under 18".

Recent Developments on Violent Content

Separately, the eSafety commissioner has not issued formal notices to platforms this week regarding graphic footage from the Sydney beach incident shared across social media. Officials commented that while the images were upsetting, they did not reach the required standard for a "refused classification" rating.

Instead, the companies have been instructed to apply warning labels and screens, such as obscuring the image, on this material in accordance with their existing community guidelines.