🔗 Share this article

In a recent appearance, star Jude Law remarked he had no concerns about backlash for playing the Russian leader in a cinematic adaptation. This production, however, could coincide so closely with the carefully constructed version promoted by Russian state media that, domestically, it functions as a compliment rather than a challenge.

The Manufactured Superhero

For years, the Kremlin and its entertainment industry have worked together to craft a made-to-measure version of Putin. This character is an infallible strategist without age or mistakes, a former spy reframed as a Russian James Bond who consistently understands beyond what he shows.

“In Russia, the manufactured Putin has long eclipsed the real one.”

Screen-Based Support

A notable instance is a television show released last fall, directed by a pro-government filmmaker. The protagonist is a fictional security officer inexplicably chosen to “save” Russia from disorder. Although he is called a different name, the implication is unmistakable: the savior must be a familiar security officer.

Western portrayals often end up buttressing this identical story instead of debunking it. A new film inspired by a popular book aims to undermine the Putin cult by framing him as a symptom but as a consequence, moving the narrative weight to the spin doctors around him.

The Fable of the Hesitant President

In the film, Putin is shown as having been picked by influential figures to stabilise the nation because he is “a fit former intelligence agent”. They visit him and all but beg him to become president. His response is that he would prefer to rule from the background, seeking enduring influence.

This narrative is a key piece of state propaganda: the detached, unwilling mastermind shaped by destiny. In reality, these events ever happened.

The Truth Behind the Selection

No one ever begged Putin to accept the role. The position was effectively a casting call with many contenders. Central to this process stood an influential oligarch from the previous administration who planned to control the state in practice.

• The shortlist featured several politicians, among them an opposition leader subsequently assassinated and a former spy chief.
• According to an expert who studied Putin’s biography, the future president simply fitted the required parameters: obedient, from the intelligence world, and not a communist or a liberal.
• A property developer familiar with the events said the primary requirement was manageability and faithfulness, not strength.

“The goal wasn't a strong candidate, they needed someone malleable, someone who would obey orders.”

Building the 007 Persona

Experts agree that the notion of him as a master operative was constructed retrospectively. Claims about his clandestine activities in Dresden do not stand up to scrutiny. Fundamentally, he handled paperwork and technical tasks, a low-level clerk not involved with field operations.

Curiously, the move to framing him as a “007” may in part have been triggered by the actor's arrival as James Bond. The grittier interpretation prompted Russian media and social media to make comparisons with their leader. Mashup posters swapping the actor's likeness with his appeared on city centers, fueling the increasing trend to frame him as a Russian 007.

A Diplomatic Opportunity?

With Jude Law, an star popular with viewers there, the Kremlin are likely to seize the chance to portray this choice as a small victory. The film's omission of mass protests, the political rivals, or key figures from its narrative, despite covering the past decade, is a pleasant bonus for state propaganda.

Domestically, the president is often an omnipotent figure who never appears on screen. His influence is signaled through photographs or calls “from above”. In this new film, he at last gets a recognizable face—one that could unintentionally echo the very myths it might seek to question.